Untitled
Media Awareness Network
Home About UsMembership SupportersPress Centre Contact Usfrançais
Search
Blog & News
Media and Internet Education Resources
For Teachers For Parents
Welcome to the Talk Media and MNet News page. Looking for the latest media news, trends and resources? Do you want a place for dialogue on media issues? Look no further because this is the place for you.

Blog & News
Media Issues
Research
Educational Games
Special Initiatives
Resources Catalogue

Content Cart
Site Directory
Help
 
blog home | français

Do you read our blog? Please support Media Awareness Network by making a one-time, tax-deductible, small charitable donation so we can continue to keep our media literacy resources up-to-date and copyright cleared for you to use in your homes, schools and communities.

Jun 11, 2010

Pop Quiz
Posted by: Matthew Johnson

In this special guest blog, MNet intern and University of Ottawa Communications MA candidate Anton van Hamel looks at how pop stars' images are tailored to different audiences.

 

Which of these girls looks older? 

 

 How about these two?

 

What about these two? 

 

 

These photos are actually the same two girls, albeit styled to give very distinct impressions. The top row shows Niatia Kirkland (AKA Lil Mama) on the left and Robyn Fenty (AKA Rihanna) on the right. With both dressed in a partially pulled-down hoodie, neither looks much older than the other.

The middle row photos are both of Lil Mama and the bottom row are both of Rihanna. In the middle row, we see Lil Mama in two very different guises. On the left her clothes and pose play up an urban, youthful image: her body is turned away from us but her eyes defiantly stare directly at the viewer, she wears unsubtle, chunky gold jewelry, affects a “don’t care” hairstyle by putting up her hair in a messy ponytail with a sweatband, and shows off a b-girl look with her DIY shoulderless sweater. This photo delivers a very different message from the one on the right, where her apparel and body language have been crafted to emphasise maturity. In this shot Lil Mama’s shoulders are square with our gaze but her eyes are looking elsewhere, projecting a disinterested, adult confidence. She thrusts one hip out, drawing attention to her silhouette which was previously hidden under her baggy “b-girl” outfit. She’s traded her flashy bling for an understated but much more opulent diamond choker and bracelet -- providing in the two shots both youthful and adult variations on the theme of conspicuous consumption. Lastly, her hairstyle is cut short and noticeably coiffed compared to the more youthful pose. With just a change of wardrobe and attitude she appears to gain ten years.

In the last pair of photos, Rihanna undergoes the same treatments to come off as a girl and a woman. In this case the major cues are facial expressions, additionally enhanced by attire. On the left, she inclines her head just a tiny bit, beckoning the viewer closer. Her eyes are narrowed a little to make her gaze smolder, accented by the heavy use of black eye-liner. To appeal to our sense of touch, she curls her fingers gingerly around a turtleneck sweater, simultaneously brushing her cheek with her fingers and her chin with the collar. Her lips are held in a purposefully ambiguous not-smile, not-frown, which invites the viewer to project their own reading onto the expression. To top it off, she wears her hair very short to emphasize the delicate, almond shape of her face. Compare this to the more girlish portrait at right, where she sports a sunny smile and looks square into the camera with eyes wide open. She’s still styled to be pretty here, but in a much less seductive way. This shot is more similar to a yearbook portrait than a professional photo shoot.

Although images are not a language per se, they do follow rules to reliably produce a particular impression. When considering the role of each sign in an image, there are no hard and fast rules that specific signs always mean the same thing. The French scholar Roland Barthes famously described the flexible nature of connotations of signs in images, with changes in meaning dependant on their position in relation to all the other signs in an image. In the examples above, Lil Mama deploys a bit of androgyny with her b-girl clothes to look more tomboyish and emphasize her youthfulness, while Rihanna’s androgynous hairstyle is an integral part of her grown-up look. The connotations of androgyny change depending on the other signs that go with it in these images, to the point where androgyny is actually being used to play up femininity.

People who make their living producing images, such as photographers, stylists, publicists, directors and pop idols, learn how to use those signs to convey the impression they want to make. Although teen girls who are trying to send a signal to their circle of friends and pop music producers who are trying to send a signal to an audience of millions are working on different scales, the principle is very much the same. Depending on your audience, you need to tailor the signals you send out very carefully. Even your age can have a certain amount of wiggle room when dressed in the right signs.

No one walks around with their age stamped clearly on their body, but it is usually possible to guess how old someone is by paying attention to the signs they use. In the still photographs above, the producer of each image is making a statement about whether the person you are looking at is a ‘girl’ or a ‘woman’ by using clothes, jewelry, facial expression and body language.  For the sake of a fairer comparison, what if we look at a music video for each artist that has been released in the same year? Both videos were chart toppers, both were included in Rolling Stone’s top 100 songs of 2007, and both were nominated for awards (“Lip Gloss” won MTV’s monster single of the year, while “Umbrella” won the Grammy for best rap/sung collaboration) so their level of impact is comparable. More importantly, since they both appeared in the same year, differences in the signals they send aren’t due to differences in changing tastes and fashion. As far as what was ‘in’ at the time, both record companies had access to the same palate to dress up the star of each video. Despite that, the end results are purposefully pretty distinct.

Lip Gloss http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-eqMeapv2J8 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CvBfHwUxHIk

Umbrella http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CvBfHwUxHIk

 

  Umbrella (Rihanna) Lip Gloss (Lil Mama)
Album Title  Good Girl Gone Bad Voice of the Young People
Setting  Abstract sets which emphasize texture/lighting Lil Mama’s former high-school, interior shots including hallways, gym, cafeteria, principal’s office
Clothes Very slinky, black, tactile haute couture costumes.
Clothing considerably revealing and provocative.
Artistic nude shots
Casual b-girl street clothes (jeans, hoodie, sneakers)
Exposes very little skin
Dance  Burlesque style dance
Mix of hip hop, breaking, and popping across different shots
Other characters Jay-Z at introduction Artist’s mother offering advice and support at introduction, classmates, principal
Tone Most shots are monochromatic, sometimes with metallic tones, which gives the video a somber, more serious tone Most shots bubble over with bright, neon colours, which gives the video a playful, childlike character
Lyrics Now that it’s raining more than ever/know that we’ll still have each other/you can stand under my umbrella/you can stand under my umbrella – ella - ella I said my lipgloss is poppin’/my lipgloss is cool/all the boys keep jockin/they chase me after school
         

 

Although Rihanna only looks older relative to Lil Mama, she is definitely more precocious and seductive in this video. The amount of skin she shows off is only a small part of that image; to maximize the effect, every other aspect has to follow in lockstep with that idea. The dance routine Rihanna performs in the middle with her umbrella is a good example. The ginger, dainty steps and slow dips and rises are more in the spirit of burlesque than R n’ B. Similarly, the monochrome palate of the entire video draws attention away from colour to allow the audience to linger more on the tactile, textural aspect of the footage. The glossy pleather, rainslicked surfaces, and even close-ups on Rihanna’s skin painted silver are all meant to appeal to the sense of touch and fit a more sexed up image.

Contrast that impression to the one Lil Mama chooses for the Lip Gloss video. The exposition with her own mother at the opening sets her up as a high-school student and daughter, but this is just the tip of the iceberg. The clothes she wears are not particularly feminine (jeans, sweat socks, sweaters) and not at all ‘mature’; they emphasize an unpretentious, youthful look. This extends to the rest of the video, whose entire palate brims with electric, primary colours. There is no subtlety of flavour, just the visual equivalent of eating a fistful of candy. Certain stock characters which appear in the background like the nerd and the principal are played up to a cartoonish effect; a parody of high-school life but which emphasize the kid setting and tone nonetheless.

Interestingly enough, when these videos were made, Rihanna was only a year older than Lil Mama, yet because each video tugs the performer so hard in one direction, the margin appears much wider. Lil Mama’s youthfulness is keyed up while Rihanna’s precociousness is amplified. That difference between ‘girl’ and ‘woman’ is only one tip of a multi-pronged image the producers have crafted to attract their target audiences. What kind of audience do you think the producers for each performer want to reach via these images? The album titles work as a pretty concise statement.

Whether a performer projects a younger or older persona is not necessarily fixed, of course. Former Disney princess Miley Cyrus recently transition from a squeaky clean pop starlet image to a much more precocious, mature persona. The Atlantic commented on how Cyrus, made famous by her kid-friendly alter-ego Hannah-Montana, is ferociously breaking from her former image to establish herself as a less tame, more adult artist. To that end the producers of her “Can’t Be Tamed” video have carefully borrowed from and alluded to the styles and sounds of previous starlets who have made the transition, notably Christina Aguilera and Britney Spears. As mentioned in an earlier MNet post, musical taste is deeply enmeshed with identity, particularly for young people. From a marketing perspective, this observation echoes the fact that consumers establish brand loyalties very early in life, making the youth audience a valuable target group for developing lifelong customers. The transformation from teen starlet to grown-up sex-bomb is driven by economics: performers need to enlarge their audience to reach adults and maintain the loyalty of the original, maturing fan base. Whereas in decades past Cyrus fans might have outgrown the starlet and graduated to a more adult performer (perhaps one supported by the same record label,) the reigning logic now is to maximize consumer loyalty to the star-as-brand and “adultify” her to keep up with the evolving taste of her original fans. This process has very little to do with the starlet’s actual age, but rather through carefully selected and manufactured signs which connote the change.

Deconstructing this sort of image after the fact is a fun exercise, but trying your own hand at production is even more interesting. Once you’ve been faced with the same kind of decisions producers make, you can appreciate just how carefully crafted images are. With so much money at stake, producers have very little room for error, so each and every detail counts. The US-based Media Education Lab has designed just such an activity for youth to create a virtual starlet and manage all the little aspects of her look, message, and music. From the splash screen, click the music studio button and then pop music producer. The same site also offers a variety of other games addressing commercial media aimed at girl consumers.

http://www.mypopstudio.com/

For Teachers:

• Pop Star Producer gives students a great deal of freedom to combine different lyrics, clothes, and effects. Have students compare and contrast how the exact same sign (a hairstyle, a line of lyrics, etc) in two starlets can be used as part of different overall impressions. How does the connotation of that one sign change when presented alongside several others?

• After students have created their starlets, extend the exercise by having them explain which audience each starlet is meant to reach, referring both to individual signs and the combined, overall impression.

• An increasingly popular strategy for producers of culture is to make their products more resilient by having more than one fan base built-in. For a real challenge, assign students to create a starlet in Pop Star Producer who can simultaneously reach two different audiences (such as children and adults, or hip hop fans and techno fans). Get students to explain how their starlet strikes a balance between attracting two audiences without alienating either one.

 
Sep 25, 2008

Spoiled Bratz
Posted by: Matthew Johnson

It’s been a rough couple of months for a brat. Or rather for Bratz – the giant-headed, almond-eyed, scantily dressed dolls that have been giving Barbie a scare for the last few years. One of the toy success stories of the last decade, the Bratz juggernaut now shows signs of slowing down: first, a $100 million judgment against the dolls’ manufacturer, MGA Entertainment, which ruled that the original designer first drew them while still under contract at Mattel; then a successful campaign by parents to keep Bratz books out of the Scholastic catalogue, which places books in thousands of schools across North America; and, most painfully, reports that stores have cut shelf space for Bratz by as much as 50 per cent.
 
Parents and other concerned observers should probably wait before celebrating, though. None of these events necessarily mean that the end is near for Bratz, nor for other dolls that promote a distorted image of women’s bodies and sexuality. The loss of shelf space is most likely nothing more than the waning of a fad, and Scholastic insists that the parent campaign had no influence on their decision to remove Bratz books from their catalogue. More importantly, the attitudes towards body image and sexuality which Bratz dolls represent aren’t going to disappear anytime soon.
 
Barbie, of course, has long been criticized for her unrealistic measurements, and it may have been surprising to some to be looking back wistfully to the time when she ruled the doll aisle. The 2007 American Psychiatric Association Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls Report (APA Report) singled out both Bratz dolls and cartoons as particularly bad examples, noting that “Bratz dolls come dressed in sexualized clothing such as miniskirts, fishnet stockings, and feather boas. Although these dolls may present no more sexualization of girls or women than is seen in MTV videos, it is worrisome when dolls designed specifically for 4- to 8-year-olds are associated with an objectified adult sexuality.” At the same time, Bratz were only one of many examples of images of adult sexuality in young girls. An analysis of magazines such as Newsweek and Ladies Home Journal found 38 ads that were seen to portray children “in sexual ways,” and only a campaign by parents (similar to the one which had no effect on Scholastic’s decision not to include Bratz books in their catalogue) prevented the release of dolls based on the Pussycat Dolls pop group.
 
The APA Report suggests that “The objectified sexuality presented by these dolls, as opposed to the healthy sexuality that develops as a normal part of adolescence, is limiting for adolescent girls.” Evidence for this may be the proliferation of revealing and provocative MySpace and Facebook profiles, in which adolescent girls are taught to trade sexuality for attention. A sixteen-year-old interviewed in an article for the New Haven Advocate put it succinctly: “I don't think it's about sex or anything like that. MySpace is like this place where you can accept friends and be friends with everyone. The girls with those [revealing] pictures, they have so many friends and most of them are people [they're] never going to meet."
 
There’s reason to hope that a backlash against preteen sexuality has begun, with books such as Packaging Girlhood (reviewed here recently) critiquing the ways in which various media conspire to sell a particular image of femininity to girls. Another good example is the NFB film Sexy, Inc, which examines these issues and, like Packaging Girlhood, suggests strategies for countering the sexualizing influence of these images on boys and girls. In some countries, such as Australia, advertising codes have been revised to specifically ban sexualized images of children.
 
The fact, though, is that using teen sexuality to sell products will most likely continue to remain popular. Bratz dolls, with their heavy makeup and streetwalker fashions, are just another way of playing make-believe, of letting girls pretend to be older, just as little girls once played “house” and Barbie and Ken were sent on dream dates. As Deborah Tolman, one of the authors of the APA Report says, “Nine-year-old girls do not experience dressing up in a sexy way as a sexy thing. They're just wearing clothes and thinking it's cool to look older.” Preteens naturally want to pretend to be older, and if the image of adolescence and adulthood they get from the media is an exclusively sexual one, that’s what they’ll embrace.
 
MNet resources on sexualisation of girls
 
 
 
 
Mar 08, 2007

Much Talks: Body Image
Posted by: Warren Nightingale

Tonight, Thursday March 8, at 7pm and 10pm ET MuchMusic is featuring an hour long special program called Much Talks: Body Image. The documentary style program follows MuchMusic VJs Sarah Taylor and Devon Soltendieck as they talk to youth on body image issues—from plastic surgery to eating disorders, media pressure to self-esteem issues.

Initiate classroom discussion on the topic of body image in the media. Questions to explore with students can include:

• Why do you think there is so much focus on body image in Western societies?
 
• Where do our notions of an "ideal" body come from? (Examples can include media, family, peers, community, sports, etc.)

• How would you describe the “ideal” body as it is appears in various media? (Answers may include thin, young, muscular, digitally altered.) Why do you think these types of images are used? (Answers may include that there is often commercial implications such as being used to sell products.)

• What do you think are the messages associated with these types of images?

• How does the ideal image of men’s and women's bodies differ throughout the ages?

• Do you think teenage girls are especially vulnerable to these ideas? Do teenage boys feel similar pressures?

For background information on this topic, visit the Web page Beauty and Body Image in the Media or visit our Lesson Library for classroom resources. More information on Much Talks: Body Image can be accessed on the MuchMusic Web site.

 
Oct 16, 2006

Short video reveals the illusion of cover girl beauty
Posted by: Warren Nightingale

Dove's short film "Evolution"

The Dove Self Esteem Fund has released a short video entitled Evolution on the Campaign for Real Beauty Web site. Evolution shows how a model’s “beauty” is constructed in advertisements.
 
The video opens with an average looking model being transformed through lighting, makeup and hair styling. Her image is then digitally altered to give the model wide eyes, high cheekbones and a streamlined neck. Once the transformation is complete, the camera angle is widened to reveal the doctored image of her on a billboard. The video ends with the statement: No wonder our perception of beauty is distorted.
 
Evolution can be used as a resource to share and discuss with students. Click here to watch the video on the Campaign for Real Beauty Web site. 
 
The video is Dove’s latest initiative to promote real, natural beauty, in an effort to offset the unrealistically thin and unhealthy archetypal images associated with modelling. Visit the teachable moment Dove’s The Campaign for Real Beauty for activities that take a closer look at this marketing campaign.
 
 
Oct 05, 2006

Another Digital Makeover
Posted by: Warren Nightingale

Not even newscasters are immune digital makeovers.
 
Brian Stelter of the blog TVNewser recently pointed out alterations in a promotional photo of CBS evening anchorwoman Katie Couric. Stelter identifies the first photo as Couric’s official CBS photo taken last May. The second photo, with alterations to her waist, neck and arms to make her appear slimmer, is from the fall edition of “Watch”, a magazine produced by CBS.
 
One has to wonder if Dan Rather ever had his photo altered.   
 
Check out Photographic Truth in the Digital Era for a Teachable Moment that examines digital manipulation.
 




 

MNet News

Sign up for MNET news

Recent Blog Entries

Search the Blog

Categories

Archives
 Aug 2010 - 2 entries
 Jul 2010 - 5 entries
 Jun 2010 - 9 entries
 Apr 2010 - 5 entries
 Mar 2010 - 7 entries
 Feb 2010 - 5 entries
 Jan 2010 - 5 entries
 Dec 2009 - 14 entries
 Nov 2009 - 10 entries
 Oct 2009 - 15 entries
 Sep 2009 - 1 entries
 Jul 2009 - 7 entries
 Jun 2009 - 11 entries
 May 2009 - 3 entries
 Apr 2009 - 6 entries
 Mar 2009 - 5 entries
 Feb 2009 - 11 entries
 Jan 2009 - 4 entries
 Dec 2008 - 7 entries
 Nov 2008 - 9 entries
 Oct 2008 - 4 entries
 Sep 2008 - 11 entries
 Aug 2008 - 3 entries
 Jul 2008 - 15 entries
 Jun 2008 - 2 entries
 May 2008 - 2 entries
 Apr 2008 - 13 entries
 Mar 2008 - 11 entries
 Feb 2008 - 3 entries
 Jan 2008 - 8 entries
 Dec 2007 - 2 entries
 Nov 2007 - 8 entries
 Oct 2007 - 2 entries
 Sep 2007 - 4 entries
 Aug 2007 - 3 entries
 Jul 2007 - 4 entries
 Jun 2007 - 7 entries
 May 2007 - 3 entries
 Apr 2007 - 5 entries
 Mar 2007 - 7 entries
 Feb 2007 - 18 entries
 Jan 2007 - 13 entries
 Dec 2006 - 10 entries
 Nov 2006 - 15 entries
 Oct 2006 - 14 entries